Selecting sources that support answering a particular research question with relevant, credible information that distinguishes between fact and opinion.
對于特定的研究問題,選擇支持該問題答案的材料,并提供相關的、可信的信息,以區分事實和觀點。
0
No evidence of selecting sources that are relevant to a research question.
沒有選擇與研究問題相關的信息源。
1
Accurately describes the overall structure of a story, drama, or poem, and analyzes the impact of the author's structural choices on overall meaning and style.
OR
Accurately describes key organizing features and sections in a non-fiction text and analyzes in detail how the structure of a specific paragraph and/or specific sentences supports understanding of a key concept.
準确描述故事、戲劇或詩歌的整體結構,并分析作者的結構選擇對整體意義和風格的影響。
或
準确描述非虛構文本中的關鍵組織特征和章節,并詳細分析特定段落和/或特定句子的結構如何支持對關鍵概念的理解。
2
Selects information relevant to the research question from provided sources of varied format (e.g., charts, graphs, diagrams, time lines, animations, or interactive elements on Web pages).
從提供的各種格式的材料(如圖表、圖形、圖表、時間線、動畫或網頁上的互動元素)中選擇與研究問題相關的信息。
3
Selects sources that provide key evidence relevant to the research question.
When relevant, sources vary in format.
選擇與研究問題相關的提供了關鍵論據的材料。
相關時,材料的格式各不相同。
4
Selects sources that provide credible information relevant to the research question.
When relevant, sources vary in perspective and/or format.
選擇與研究問題相關的提供了可信信息的材料。
相關時,材料在視角和/或格式上有所不同。
5
Selects sources that provide detailed, credible information relevant to the research question.
When relevant, sources vary in perspective and/or format.
選擇與研究問題相關的提供了詳細、可信信息的材料。
相關時,材料在視角和/或格式上有所不同。
6
Selects sources that provide detailed, comprehensive, credible information relevant to the research question.
When relevant, sources vary in perspective and/ or format.
選擇與研究問題相關的提供了詳細、全面、可信信息的材料。
相關時,材料在視角和/或格式上有所不同。
7
Selects sources that provide nuanced, comprehensive, credible information relevant to the research question.
When relevant, sources vary in perspective and/or format.
Any gaps or limitations in sources are noted.
選擇與研究問題相關的提供了細微、全面、可信信息的材料。
相關時,材料在視角和/或格式上有所不同。
注意材料中的任何差距或限制。
8
Selects sources that provide nuanced, comprehensive, credible information relevant to the research question at a level of detail and complexity appropriate to the audience and purpose of the research.
When relevant, sources vary in perspective and/or format.
Any gaps or limitations in sources are noted and the impact of those gaps and limitations is discussed.
選擇與研究問題相關的提供了細緻入微、全面、可信信息的材料,其詳細程度和複雜性适合受衆和研究目的。
相關時,材料在視角和/或格式上有所不同。
注意材料中的任何差距或限制,并讨論這些差距和限制的影響。
我将陸續更新薩米特高中“認知能力量表”相關内容。這系列文章是基于“Cognitive-Skills-Document-Suite.pdf”提供的翻譯,分享給大家,供家長和教育界感興趣的朋友參考。
轉發、關注、私信,獲取全文。
更多精彩资讯请关注tft每日頭條,我们将持续为您更新最新资讯!